Why Dropbox remains my pick of the cloud services litter

Sections: Features, iDevice Apps, Internet / Websites, iPad, iPhone, iPhone/iPod touch/iPad, iPod touch, Mac Software, Opinions and Editorials

submit to reddit

There’s certainly no poverty of choice in cloud computing services these days. In addition to Apple’s iCloud, there is Microsoft’s SkyDrive which just launched a new Mac support app, Google Drive which did likewise a couple of weeks back, and with their new Amazon Cloud Drive application for OS X. Another option you can use with your Mac is SugarSync, whose program for OS X allows you to select any file on your system to upload to the service, and can also actively sync files in specified sync folders.

Then there’s the granddaddy of them all, Dropbox, which Steve Jobs reportedly wanted to buy as a basis for what eventually emerged as iCloud, but was turned down by Dropbox creator Drew Houston. For my purposes, Dropbox has proved near-ideal. I also use, but for archival storage and access from multiple devices rather than for synching.

Dropbox remains my fave for several reasons, not least that it epitomizes the old Mac ideal of it “just works.” From the time I first downloaded the Dropbox software for my various production machines, Dropbox has pretty much just worked, staying in the background and requiring no attention save for installing occasional software version upgrades.

There has also been a certain default aspect to my affinity for Dropbox and, which is that they work with all of my production devices, including two old Pismo PowerBooks running OS X 10.4 that I still have in daily general dogsbody service. Both iCloud and SkyDrive require OS X 10.7 Lion, which I don’t have installed on any of my computers, and Amazon Cloud Drive wants an intel processor. is accessed with a standard Web browser. I prefer data access and archiving solutions that support non-proprietary (or at least multi-platform) access.

The only device I have that’s supported by iCloud and SkyDrive is my iPad 2, so I haven’t bothered establishing an account with either. I could install Lion on my Core 2 Duo MacBook, but I like Snow Leopard and I don’t really like any of the changes Lion has introduced, and my old Pismos would still be unsupported.

As it is, Dropbox keeps all of my work in progress and research notes synchronized among the three Macs and the iPad, and does so elegantly. I haven’t encountered anything that I don’t like about Dropbox, and it’s hard to imagine how I ever got along without it.


The Dropbox Mac client happily supports Power PC Macs running OS X 10.4 Tiger and up, as well as iOS devices, while Apple has chosen not to enable iCloud to support OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, which is still the most widely-used OS X version.

Dropbox gives you a basic 2 GB capacity for free, which is less than you get with iCloud or the other free Cloud services, but you can boost your free space allotment by referring others to the Dropbox service. For every referral you invite that installs Dropbox, you’ll get 500 MB of free space up to a maximum of 16 GB. If you need more capacity that that, you can get 50 GB for $9.99 monthly or $99.00 annually.

I currently have 3.5 GB, which has so far proved ample for my purposes, being as the readout says I’m using just 3.6% of my available space.

Product [Dropbox]

Print Friendly
  • rolf

    hi Charles…

    you seem to contradict your other AppleTell contributor Aaron Kraus who likes SugarSync in yesterday’s article.

    you prefer DropBox but none of its advantages you mentioned, SugarSync does not have. plus all the Cloud services available, incl. the newly hailed but overhyped GoogleDrive or SkyDrive have the biggest, most inconvenient and totally impractical omission! that of SugarSync’s! that of bypass forced storage convention!

    SugarSync is efficient, is multi-platform compatible, just works like Apple stuff, and gives you the flexibility unlike all others of syncing do the folder(s) you wish, not their choice! not to mention they don’t pay the silly game as DropBox on getting more HD space.

    plus cost:
    DB = 2GB free but SS 5GB.

    DB = $10/mth/50GB or ¢2/MB
    SS = $50/yr/30GB or ¢1.4/MB

    so, what does DropBox have over SugarSync, seriously?
    i’m curious and would like to be enlightened, so i’m best informed as to which Cloud to use,

    thank you,

  • Charles W. Moore

    Hi Rolf,

    SugarSync sounds like an excellent Cloud service in the various reviews I’ve read, and it appears to have several advantages over Dropbox, not least as you point out more free capacity.

    However, as I noted in the article, I require support for my two hotrodded Pismo PowerBooks, which only are supported up to Mac OS X 10.4, and SugarSync, alas, requires a minimum of OS X 10.5 Leopard.

    That’s the deal-breaker for me, since Dropbox as far as I know the only major Cloud service whose software supports Tiger. Also, as I said, it just works, and the free capacity it does offer has proved more than ample for my main requirement of syncing work in progress across four different machines.


  • Richard

    Also, SS does not support PPC Macs at all, and doesn’t make earlier versions available.