TechnologyTell

The Problem With That “Wolf of Wall Street” Open Letter

Sections: Movies

5
Print Friendly

Photo from Wolf of Wall StreetTo all of the many controversies that have arisen in response to the release last week of Martin Scorsese’s “The Wolf of Wall Street,” add one more: There’s an open letter, written by the daughter of one of the victims of ‘Wolf’ protagonist Jordan Belfort’s financial scams, which was published last week in L.A. Weekly. Written by Christina McDowell, the letter castigates the film, director Martin Scorsese and star Leonardo DiCaprio for “exacerbating our national obsession with wealth and status and glorifying greed and psychopathic behavior.”

Now, when I heard that there was an open letter out there from the daughter of one of Belfort’s victims, I assumed it was one of the people Belfort scammed in a fraudulent stock deal or one of his other financial shenanigans. But that’s not it at all- McDowell’s father, Tom Prousalis, was in fact one of Belfort’s co-conspirators, who went to jail as well, leaving McDowell and the rest of the family in deep debt. Belfort was later slated to testify against Prousalis, although his testimony was ultimately not used.

So what’s the problem with the letter, aside from the smug, condescending tone throughout, and its insistence that all depiction equals endorsement? A few things:

-  One, it’s pretty clear that McDowell hasn’t seen the film. If she had, she’d know that it does not “glorify” the crimes of Belfort and Co.- not even close. The film treats its subjects as degenerate, criminal scum. The filmmakers haven’t been “conned”- they knew exactly what they were doing and what they were dealing with. Does McDowell think “The Wolf of Wall Street”  is primarily the story of Jordan Belfort, financial genius, and that it somehow downplays that what Stratton Oakmont was doing was illegal? The characters’ criminal and sociopathic tendencies are both established relatively early on.

Sure, some idiots have misinterpreted the film and believe that Belfort and his friends are heroes and role models. But the same thing happened with Breaking Bad and “Team Walt,” too. Was Breaking Bad an irresponsible project that glorified crystal meth, and therefore shouldn’t have existed?

- McDowell’s father sounds like a complete scumbag, who not only participated in Belfort’s crimes but stole from his own family and later tried, twice, to steal his daughter’s identity.  For that I have sympathy. But you know what? McDowell should be mad at her father, and at Belfort and the other conspirators. Not at the people who made a movie about it.

- McDowell compares her mother to Cate Blanchett’s character in “Blue Jasmine” and says “she looks like a cross between Sharon Stone and Michelle Pfeiffer. Totally your leading ingénue type.” Which indicates that maybe her real beef is that she wishes Scorsese had made a movie about her story instead.

- The author writes that “this kind of behavior brought America to its knees.” Which, while a bit subtle, is exactly the film’s point.

- Scorsese and DiCaprio “call themselves liberals,” and DiCaprio drives a Honda hybrid? What on earth does either of those have to do with anything? And besides, I haven’t known Scorsese to have association with any political cause, aside from early-20th century film preservation.

- “What makes you think this man deserves to be the protagonist in this story?” Like they used to say on The Wire, “deserve got nothing to do with it.” Does Hannibal Lechter “deserve” to be protagonist of a film? Do the people who perpetuated Abscam? Does every Nazi, serial killer or mobster who’s ever been subject of a biopic? Does Henry Hill?

Subjects of films aren’t chosen on the strength of how much they “deserve” to have a film made about them, and a world that worked like that would lead to much worse movies.

The Act of Killing” is a documentary about a bunch of men in Indonesia who led death squads in the 1960s. They did things many orders of magnitude worse than what Stratton Oakmont did. But the film was one of the most compelling, enthralling documentaries I’ve ever seen and one of the best movies of 2013, in part because it looked deeply at the nature of evil. Do those people not “deserve” a film being made about them?

- As for McDowell’s avowal that she’d preorder tickets to “August, Osage County, rather than “Wolf”? I’m sure the entire ‘Wolf” team is quaking in their boots over that threat.

I sympathize with Christina McDowell’s ordeal and I wish it hadn’t happened. She has every right to be angry. But that doesn’t change that no one has any business writing an essay that trashes a film they haven’t seen.

5
Print Friendly

5 Comments

  1. Pingback: ExciteReview | A visual recap of Startup Asia Jakarta 2013

  2. Good article and I’m glad you wrote it. Here’s my open letter back to her.

    Dear Christina,

    The problem is not your father or the movie, the problem is you. I have never read a more “poor me” self-entitled, white privileged and blame projecting article in my life. Couch surfing is suffering? What an idiotic complaint. You had to ‘couch surf’? Are you kidding me? A luxurious life was provided to you and when that went away you complained. You had a Range Rover in high school? I walked or rode the yellow bus.Your credit was ruined? That’s 15 years ago and way beyond the statute of limitations. You had to get a job as a waitress? Poor baby. I’ve worked 3 jobs daily. Going to college was delayed? Are you seriously saying that? Shut the hell up. Most people don’t even go to college.

    You are the most self-centered and self-absorbed, self-created martyr I have never met. If I was your father I would go to Albania just to get away from you.

    Shame on you. I would suggest you do some humanitarian work and get off your ‘poor me’ “I’m a victim” – even though you aren’t really, pedestal. You know nothing of real life suffering. Do you even have a job? No one escaped Stratton Oakmont or the affiliated companies unscathed or unharmed. The mere fact you plan to write a memoir completely discredits you and makes you look like a hypocrite.

    I believe in forgiveness and redemption. Especially when drugs and alcohol are involved. Not making excuses but Belfort and others have PAID financially and PAID by being incarcerated and PAID restitution and that is enough.

    I didn’t think the movie glorified what happened. It clearly shows Jordan Belfort was a drug and sex addict with many flaws whose actions changed peoples lives for the better and some for the worse. He was extremely good to his employees but seriously a degenerate on drugs and morally corrupt and misguided.

    No one involved with Jordan Belfort was left unscathed. No one glamorized the movie. If anything the movie served to vilify the cast of characters. On a scale of 1 to 10, there were no murders so I would grade the “pain and suffering” ” of the wealthiest 1% of Americans at a 3. Maybe. Because what you fail to mention is the bulk of the clients at Stratton Oakmont, not all, sneezed million dollar bills for breakfast. One in particular showed up in court with a fake oxygen tank attempting to defraud the fraudsters himself. So my sympathy is limited. I have none for you.

    Ana
  3. Pingback: Ongoing Idiot Wind - Hollywood Elsewhere

  4. Pingback: Why I don't especially care which movie wins Best Picture | EntertainmentTell

  5. To the author of this article you are an idiot and should not write on ANY public forum. Do me a favor and read the rebuttal letter he wrote his daughter then perhaps you will take this factually inaccurate bullshit you posted down and write a retraction with an appologie. When you are done with those things genius go read another open letter the father wrote to a journalist at the Washington Post who wrote an article similarly facturly in accurate as his daughter saw to. From what you posted it sounds like you and that ridiculously immature daughter are two of a kind. All the daughter did was show myself and others that she is disgrace with NO moral compass and a seriously flawed memory of past facts. Probably due to the fact that she so proudly stated was from “snorting half of Columbia” ! Wow that’s going to go over huge when trying to get a respectable job as a professional actress. That’s exactly what Hollywood wants another actress that “snorted half of Columbia”. This girl doesn’t even have the common sense to not make herself look like a shitshow. Well done Christina

    Jennifer