Apple has posted their ‘Samsung didn’t copy iPad’ notice, and have done so in Arial

Sections: Apple, Business News

submit to reddit

Apple, coming by way of a recent UK court ruling, had to post a statement about how Samsung didn’t copy the iPad. More specifically, how the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe on Apple’s registered design. Anyway, Apple did indeed post that statement, and they did so in Arial just as they were expected to do. The statement opens with some mention of design numbers, goes on to cover what they needed to cover and then closes in a way that Samsung probably did not see coming. You can read the entire statement below, however to sum up the closing — Apple made it clear that while Samsung was found not guilty of infringement by a UK court, other courts didn’t come same conclusion. In fact, they stated rather clearly that in Germany it was found that Samsung “engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design” and in the US, a jury found Samsung “guilty of infringing on Apple’s design and utility patents.”

Via [Apple] and [iMore]

Samsung / Apple UK judgment

On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

“The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design.”

“The informed user’s overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool.”

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple’s design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple’s far more popular iPad.

Follow @GadgeTell on Twitter.

Print Friendly