Blackberry Messaging Susceptible to Malware and Viruses

Sections: Business News, Communications, Computers, Security, Smartphones

submit to reddit

BlackBerry Logo“Just as the Department of Defense is working to open its networks to iOS and Android mobile devices, a new report reveals that Canadian federal workers are being warned about potential security holes on BlackBerry.”

According to, Public Safety Canada — the federal agency that manages cyber-security within the government — issued a memo back in January with a severe warning to government employees about PIN-to-PIN messaging. Not mincing words, Public Safety Canada said that it found this form of mobile communication ‘to be the most vulnerable method of communicating on a BlackBerry.’ Here’s more:

The documents, released to Postmedia News under the access to information act, say PIN-to-PIN messaging isn’t “suitable for exchanging sensitive messages” because protected or classified information could be inadvertently leaked, or a mobile user could inadvertently download malware or viruses that would compromise their phone.

This is a startling statement given BlackBerry’s reputation for offering what could have been thought of as the most secure mobile platform worldwide, which was the Waterloo, Ontario-based corporation’s last saving grace, at least ahead of the pending launch of BlackBerry 10.

Frankly, this memo couldn’t come at a worse time for Blackberry, which was formerly known as Research In Motion until the mobile device maker rebranded itself in January. Not only is the company banking everything on the upcoming release of its new mobile operating system and handhelds to go with it in the face of global domination over the mobile market by Apple and Google’s Android ecosystem.”



Source [zdnet]

Print Friendly
  • Luc Davis

    PIN to PIN messaging is the equivalent of SMS, except used even less frequently. It is a legacy method of berry to berry communication that was obsoleted by BlackBerry Messenger, which IS secure. Maybe you should research what something IS before you rehash uninformed articles based on reports from several years ago.